World

Far-left insurgents recast constitutional defenders as the enemy within the Democratic Party

A growing insurgency within the American left has turned its attention inward, targeting Democrats who defend existing constitutional structures as "institutionalists," a reproach gaining currency across the party's radical wing.…

By Adaeze Nwosu·August 30, 2026·二〇二六年八月三十日·2 min read

Key takeaways

  • Pennsylvania state representative Chris Rabb, the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania's 3rd Congressional District and a democratic socialist, defended streamer Hasan Piker and dismissed Piker's critics as 'institutionalists' focused on the wrong enemies.
  • Within the American left, 'institutionalist' has become a reproach aimed at Democrats who defend existing constitutional structures, spreading across the party's radical wing during the 2026 midterm cycle.
  • Law professor Jonathan Turley describes Piker as a virulent antisemite and documented Piker's claims that America deserved the September 11 attacks, that American Jews invite attacks by supporting Israel, and his mockery of the murder of figures including Charlie Kirk.
  • Rabb has called the constitutional system 'the beast' to be slayed, denounced the Declaration of Independence, and claimed the Framers had no concept of policing, and Turley notes he is now virtually assured of a congressional seat.
  • The 'institutionalist' critique extends into academia, with legal scholars such as Erwin Chemerinsky, Ryan D. Doerfler, Samuel Moyn, Corey Brettschneider, and Mary Anne Franks publishing works criticizing the U.S. Constitution.

A growing insurgency within the American left has turned its attention inward, targeting Democrats who defend existing constitutional structures as "institutionalists," a reproach gaining currency across the party's radical wing. Pennsylvania state representative Chris Rabb, the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania's 3rd Congressional District and a democratic socialist, drew attention this week by defending streamer Hasan Piker while dismissing critics of Piker as institutionalists focused on the wrong enemies.

On Friday, Rabb posted that establishment Democrats were wrong to distance themselves from Piker, whom law professor Jonathan Turley describes as a virulent antisemite. Rabb asked why critics were targeting Piker rather than White Christian nationalists, the broligarchs, or what he called the AI overlords, describing Piker as someone encouraging young people to use their collective political power for good. Turley documented Piker's past claims that America deserved the September 11 attacks and that American Jews are asking to be attacked by supporting Israel. He also cited Piker's mockery of the murder of figures including Charlie Kirk.

Rabb is no newcomer to this current. He has called the constitutional system "the beast" to be slayed and denounced the Declaration of Independence. He has also claimed the Framers had no concept of policing. Turley notes he is now virtually assured of a congressional seat.

The broader cycle: a term spreading across party and institution

Against the backdrop of the 2026 midterm cycle, the institutionalist label has spread well beyond the Democratic Socialists of America. DSA Steering Committee member Cliff Connolly said on a podcast that the organization is famous for its "hatred of the United States Constitution." Sarada Peri, former senior speechwriter for President Barack Obama, wrote in The Atlantic that institutionalists are "peculiar creatures," older white men with a reflexive distaste for change who draw on inherited credibility to resist it.

The read-through into academia runs in the same direction. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley Law School, published "No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States." Ryan D. Doerfler of Harvard and Samuel Moyn of Yale argued in The New York Times that the nation should "reclaim America from constitutionalism." Corey Brettschneider of Brown University called the Constitution a "dangerous document," while Mary Anne Franks of George Washington law school condemned the "cult of the Constitution" for advancing White male supremacy.

Turley notes that former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Governor Gavin Newsom have each framed fealty to constitutional traditions as mere nostalgia. Abdul El-Sayed, a separate figure in the same movement, declared in his campaign that moderates including Democratic Senator John Fetterman should have their heads cut off and put on pikes.

Source · 來源

foxnews.com

Share · 分享

Frequently asked

Who is Chris Rabb and what did he do this week?

Chris Rabb is a Pennsylvania state representative, a democratic socialist, and the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania's 3rd Congressional District who this week defended streamer Hasan Piker and dismissed Piker's critics as institutionalists targeting the wrong enemies.

What does the term 'institutionalist' mean in this context?

It is a reproach used within the American left to criticize Democrats who defend existing constitutional structures, and Sarada Peri described institutionalists in The Atlantic as older white men with a reflexive distaste for change.

Why is Hasan Piker controversial according to the article?

Law professor Jonathan Turley describes Piker as a virulent antisemite, citing Piker's past claims that America deserved the September 11 attacks, that American Jews invite attacks by supporting Israel, and his mockery of the murder of figures including Charlie Kirk.

How has the anti-constitution sentiment appeared in academia?

Legal scholars including UC Berkeley Law dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Harvard's Ryan D. Doerfler, Yale's Samuel Moyn, Brown's Corey Brettschneider, and George Washington's Mary Anne Franks have published works criticizing or condemning the U.S. Constitution.

What have prominent Democrats said about constitutional traditions?

Turley notes that former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Governor Gavin Newsom have each framed fealty to constitutional traditions as mere nostalgia.