Crypto加密COINCVX

U.S. Government Takes 35% Stake in Venezuelan Oil as Coinbase Founder, Chevron, and ENI Circle the Deal

Venezuelan oil is drawing an unlikely alignment of buyers. President Trump announced last week that the U.S. government would take a 35% equity stake in North American Blue Energy Partners, the Venezuelan oil producer known as…

By Selene Vasquez·September 2, 2026·二〇二六年九月二日·2 min read

Key takeaways

  • President Trump announced last week that the U.S. government would take a 35% equity stake in North American Blue Energy Partners (BABEP), a Venezuelan oil producer.
  • A billionaire Coinbase founder is reportedly seeking direct exposure to Venezuelan crude, alongside Chevron and Italian energy company ENI.
  • The 35% government stake is described as the structural fact framing every other bid and is the only number Trump's announcement disclosed.
  • Chevron's reported interest fits its historical exposure to Venezuelan hydrocarbons, while ENI's involvement adds a European dimension to the deal.
  • The terms of the Coinbase founder's pursuit and the channel through which Trump's intervention opened this path were not disclosed.

Venezuelan oil is drawing an unlikely alignment of buyers. President Trump announced last week that the U.S. government would take a 35% equity stake in North American Blue Energy Partners, the Venezuelan oil producer known as BABEP. A billionaire Coinbase founder is also reportedly seeking a position in the same market, alongside Chevron and Italian energy company ENI.

The 35% U.S. government stake is the structural fact that frames every other bid here. A sovereign stakeholder of that size in a Venezuelan producer is not a standard capital arrangement, and it raises questions about what terms co-investors would negotiate and what regulatory posture Washington's direct equity position implies for cross-border activity in the sector. Chevron has historically maintained exposure to Venezuelan hydrocarbons, so its reported presence fits a recognizable pattern. ENI's reported involvement adds a European dimension to a deal already carrying significant geopolitical weight by virtue of Washington's position.

The Coinbase founder's reported interest is the less conventional element. A figure publicly identified with digital assets and crypto markets is now reportedly seeking direct exposure to Venezuelan crude. The terms of that pursuit were not disclosed, nor was the precise channel through which the Trump intervention reportedly opened this path.

Sovereign and sanctions risk is the discount rate every private party has to price in Venezuela. The country's oil sector has operated under a shifting legal regime for years, and a U.S. government equity stake in BABEP changes the capital structure of the deal without necessarily resolving the underlying political uncertainty. Whether Washington's position signals a broader policy shift toward Venezuela, or is specific to this arrangement, is the question the other parties will need answered before committing capital.

The 35% figure remains the only number Trump's announcement put on the table.

Related reading

Source · 來源

forbes.com

Share · 分享

Frequently asked

How large is the U.S. government's stake in the Venezuelan oil producer?

The U.S. government would take a 35% equity stake in North American Blue Energy Partners (BABEP), which is the only figure Trump's announcement put on the table.

Who are the parties reportedly circling the deal?

A billionaire Coinbase founder, Chevron, and Italian energy company ENI are all reportedly seeking positions in the Venezuelan oil market.

Why is the Coinbase founder's interest considered unconventional?

Because a figure publicly identified with digital assets and crypto markets is now reportedly seeking direct exposure to Venezuelan crude, a departure from that sector.

What risks must private investors weigh in this deal?

Investors must price in sovereign and sanctions risk, since Venezuela's oil sector has operated under a shifting legal regime and the U.S. equity stake does not resolve the underlying political uncertainty.

Does the U.S. stake signal a broader policy shift toward Venezuela?

That remains unresolved; whether Washington's position signals a broader policy shift or is specific to this arrangement is a question other parties need answered before committing capital.