Old Ether Wallets Shift 37,806 ETH as Long-Term Holder Profitability Turns Negative for First Time Since 2019
Dormant Ethereum wallets belonging to long-term holders shifted 37,806 ETH in a move that coincided with a notable inflection point: long-term whale profitability on the network turned negative for the first time since 2019. The…
HONG KONG— June 27, 2026
Dormant Ethereum wallets belonging to long-term holders shifted 37,806 ETH in a move that coincided with a notable inflection point: long-term whale profitability on the network turned negative for the first time since 2019. The development complicates the bull case for $ETH heading into what analysts have flagged as a pivotal test at the $1,500 price level.
What Moved and Why It Matters
On-chain activity from older wallets is typically read as a signal of conviction shifting — holders who sat through previous cycles deciding to act. When those wallets move coins at a moment when long-term holders are collectively underwater for the first time in roughly six years, the question becomes straightforward: are they repositioning, or are they exiting?
The 37,806 ETH figure represents meaningful supply that had been dormant long enough to be classified as belonging to long-term participants rather than short-cycle traders. That supply is now liquid.
Whale Profitability and the 2019 Comparison
The turn into negative profitability for long-term whales is the more structurally significant data point here. The last time this metric went negative was 2019 — a period Ethereum investors with long memories associate with sustained price pressure and capitulation before recovery. History does not repeat mechanically, but the comparison sets a context that the headline number of 37,806 ETH moving does not fully capture on its own.
Mixed sentiment among large holders, as the on-chain data suggests, is a different condition than straightforward bearishness or bullishness. It implies disagreement within the cohort that has historically had the most information and the longest time horizons. When whales diverge, price resolution tends to be volatile rather than directional.
The $1,500 Test
The $1,500 level cited in market commentary functions as a reference point for whether current holders can absorb the supply that older wallets are now releasing. Whether that level holds as support or breaks into further downside will depend partly on whether the wallet movement represents distribution — selling into the market — or internal consolidation among the same class of holders. The on-chain data so far does not resolve that question cleanly, which is precisely what makes the setup worth watching.
Related reading
Source · 來源