Markets市場

Jeremy Grantham Calls U.S. Stock Market Most Expensive in American History

Jeremy Grantham has declared the U.S. stock market the most expensive in American history, with soaring valuations tied to artificial intelligence pushing prices to levels he regards as historically extreme. The assessment from…

By Marcus Cole·June 26, 2026·二〇二六年六月二十六日·2 min read

HONG KONGJune 26, 2026

Jeremy Grantham has declared the U.S. stock market the most expensive in American history, with soaring valuations tied to artificial intelligence pushing prices to levels he regards as historically extreme. The assessment from the veteran investor adds a prominent skeptical voice to an equity rally that has drawn global capital into U.S.-listed technology names.

The AI Valuation Driver

Grantham's argument centers on the run-up in valuations surrounding artificial intelligence. His concern is not with the technology itself but with the price the market has assigned to the anticipated gains from it — a pattern he frames as the decisive factor in making this moment stand apart from prior peaks in U.S. market history.

The framing matters. Calling this the most expensive market in American history is a comparative claim that spans every prior bubble and cycle. It positions current AI-driven enthusiasm alongside, and above, past episodes of speculative excess in U.S. equities.

What "Most Expensive" Signals for Global Allocators

For international investors who route capital through U.S. equities, Grantham's characterization carries practical weight. When a market is priced at historically elevated levels relative to underlying fundamentals, the implied forward returns compress — a dynamic that affects pension funds, sovereign wealth vehicles, and cross-border allocators evaluating U.S. exposure against alternatives in other markets.

Grantham has a long record of identifying valuation extremes before they resolve, which gives his assessments an audience beyond the domestic market. His latest view will likely circulate among risk managers in Hong Kong, London, and Singapore who monitor U.S. positioning as a direct input into their own allocation decisions.

A Single-Cause Caution

It is worth noting that AI is doing a lot of explanatory work in Grantham's framing. Valuations across the U.S. market reflect many inputs — interest rate expectations, earnings revisions, index concentration, and passive fund flows among them. AI enthusiasm is a plausible accelerant, but attributing the entirety of a historic valuation extreme to one theme invites scrutiny. Whether the market resolves that extreme through a correction or through earnings growth that eventually justifies the prices is the question Grantham's warning leaves open.

Related reading

Source · 來源

NewsHK

Share · 分享

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

Why does Jeremy Grantham consider the U.S. stock market the most expensive in American history?

He ties the extreme valuations to AI-driven enthusiasm, arguing the market has assigned historically high prices to anticipated gains from artificial intelligence.

Is Grantham concerned about AI technology itself?

No; his concern is not with the technology but with the price the market has placed on the expected gains from it.

Why does Grantham's assessment matter for international investors?

Historically elevated valuations compress implied forward returns, affecting pension funds, sovereign wealth vehicles, and cross-border allocators who weigh U.S. exposure against other markets.

What is the main caution the article raises about Grantham's framing?

It notes that U.S. valuations reflect many factors—interest rate expectations, earnings revisions, index concentration, and passive fund flows—so attributing a historic extreme entirely to AI invites scrutiny.

How might the market resolve this valuation extreme?

The article says it remains open whether the extreme resolves through a market correction or through earnings growth that eventually justifies the prices.